Your treatment of Robert Eisenman is bogus because you are using the New Testament and Church Fathers, none of which were written before 450 AD.
Comment: I think Mr Oakes needs to take a course in logic. He attempts to discredit Robert Eisenman by using, not the extant historical evidence, but the unsubstantiated writings of “early church fathers”,and the new testament “writings” of Peter and Luke. First of all there is not a single writing of the church fathers and […]